Exactly , i am also got same problem ,thank you,i hope php runner team will resolve this issue soon as possible,
Template PHPRunner 6 does not automatically adjust.
PHPRunner Good evening friends, I am Spanish speaking, but I will use google translator to express myself.
I have developed a web application used layoud PHPRunner 5.3, "London" and color schema "London".
Also I have the same application developed PHPRunner 6 build 8778 using the layout "Rome," style "Extravaganza", and color scheme "Blue_white.."
When I run the webapp developed PHPRunner 5.3 the content is adjusted to fit the browser window automatically.
While the application equivalent PHPRunner 6 to time to reduce the size of the browser window does not fit the content of the application, the contrary appears automatically scroll bars horizontally and vertically.
- This behavior PHPRunner template 6, have this problem because they are beta or a mistake that would fit in the revisions before the final version.
- I have also seen the need for a layout in PHPRunner 6 having the PHPRunner 5.3. I mean the layout "Madrid" or "Paris", which have the following structure: In this menu Top area in a block in the same top in another block below the search area. Then only this block of datagrid. None of the layout of PHPRunner 6 fits this pattern.
HEADER
Header Area
TOP
Menu Zone
Area search bar
LEFT
Empty
CONTENT
Datagrid Zone
RIGHT
Empty
BOTTON
Footer area
The latter because of necessity of programs, in many cases is required in the configuration described above.
In the current layout of PHPRunner 6, the search area or is in the LEFT or RIGHT, but in TOP, with the menu area.
If you could add the style editor of this ability to move blocks from one area to another would be excellent. Or failing to add a layout with this structure.
- With respect to combolist search criteria, if in this version we could enable the possibility that the developer can determine whether all or some of the criteria are activated or not would be excellent. Now if you could rename at least the Spanish version the option "equivalent" to "equal" would be better.
I hope these suggestions out of the same process of development with this super tool are taken into account.
I say goodbye to waiting for feedback.
